January 30, 2023

Roe v. Wade reversal would put local prosecutors on the front lines of the abortion fight

5 min read


Proponents of abortion fear law enforcement will crack down on the most vulnerable communities in the states that ban abortion, while anti-abortion activists plan to do so. How to tighten the noose around progressive prosecutors who are vowing not to enforce abortion crimes if the tide turns.

The 1973 ruling and successor court rulings guarantee the right to abortion up to about 23 weeks of gestation, until the fetus becomes viable. Draft majority vote This was revealed by Politico on Monday The Conservative Supreme Court is moving to overturn these reservations, although its decision will not be final until a formal decision is made by the end of June.

In the post-Roe world, abortion has become a major issue not only in the federal and state race, but also in the campaign for local offices that will enforce the new legal scenario around this procedure.

Katie Glenn, a government affairs lawyer for the anti-abortion group Americans United for Life, said: Are. ” “Politicians are definitely people and they are vote counters, and so I definitely think there will be an element of reading room as far as the local community wants.”

Before the leaked draft signaled to the Supreme Court to reverse the trend, some state and local prosecutors were vowing not to enforce abortion charges if the precedent was rejected. The pledges, in part, have prompted anti-abortion lawmakers to push for new measures in Texas, including a six-week abortion ban. Civil litigation for discouraging providers from offering procedures.

Jackson Women's Health Organization, the last abortion clinic in Mississippi, in Jackson, Mississippi.
“I think one of the arguments was that getting rid of the tears would reduce the conflict by allowing everyone to reach a local solution, and instead, you are only seeing the intensity of the conflict as it increases. Is becoming local, “wrote Marie Ziegler, a professor at Florida State University College of Law. A book Reviewing US abortion law since Roe.

Educators who have studied the implementation of abortion bans – either internationally, or Roe v. In the US before the Wade case is decided, it is said that the desire to prioritize abortion crimes will depend on who is handling the prosecution positions and the political environment. On time.

Michelle O’Brien, a professor at the University of Santa Clara University School of Law, author of the study, noted that local law enforcement officers face limited resources. Seeking a ban on abortion abroad.

“Because they are elected officials. [they’re also] It’s sensitive about what they think their circles want, and what their circles will do, what the jury will actually do, “O’Brien told CNN.

Roe vowed not to prosecute for abortion crimes.

At the discretion of local authorities, abortion will become a key policy issue in these generations, both sides have predicted.

Texas Right to Life Legislative Director John Sego said, “Right now, the average voter is probably thinking about their congressman or their state legislators when they think about pro-life or pro-choice and research on these candidates. Do. ” “In this next chapter of the pro-life struggle, many of these decisions are going to be at the grassroots level.”

It will make a difference, she said, “in fact to ensure that we are free from abortion, and not only does the law prohibit abortion but in practice … our elected officials on the other hand Watching. ”

With an unprecedented leak, Roberts suddenly appears ineffective.

The prosecution’s discretion is already taking the form of a flashpoint in a race like the re-election of Democratic Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, whose state has banned pre-abortion books if Roe If the precedent is rejected then it can be enforced.

“My office will not be involved in any of these cases,” he told reporters this week, highlighting his Republican opponent’s commitment to law enforcement. Michigan’s 83 county prosecutors could still potentially prosecute cases. Seven of them have also taken vows. Abortion crimes should not be prosecuted. (Democratic state authorities have also filed a lawsuit in the state Supreme Court asking it to lift the 1931 ban).
Dozens of state and local prosecutors signed the statements. 2019 And 2020 Commitment not to enforce certain laws criminalizing abortion in an effort organized by the Group Fair and Justice Prosecution. The organization also filed a lawsuit A brief statement from a friend of the court About 100 current or former prosecutors and law enforcement officials in the case before the Supreme Court. He argued that criminalizing abortion would create distrust in law enforcement agencies in the communities they are trying to protect.

Former federal prosecutor and group executive director Maryam Kransky told CNN, “If the law is changed … there will be a lack of confidence in the integrity of the rule of law, not just chaos.” .

Amanda Lutman – who leads Run for Something, which recruits progressive candidates for down ballot offices – said she expected the issue to play a big role in all kinds of local races. Will be found, including for prosecution positions, because these officials have a “more direct” role in how abortion policy is carried out in certain ways.

“Congressional campaigns will have to rely on collective action,” he said, adding that a Democratic congressional candidate can only protect abortion rights if he or she is elected by a legislative majority. “It’s not locally accurate. You only need one.”

The governor signed a bill in the mail criminalizing abortion drugs.

Anti-abortion activists are looking at ways to achieve the fact that prosecutors serving the blue jurisdiction in the red states may hate enforcing anti-abortion laws. According to Sego, the proposals being debated in Texas include giving the state attorney general the power to prosecute or allowing a local district attorney to prosecute abortion crimes in neighboring jurisdiction if the home prosecutor does so. Is refusing

His group is urging Texas and other states to expand the use of the six-week ban enforcement mechanism – which allows individuals from anywhere to choose between suppliers or illegal abortions. File a lawsuit against the facilitator in a state court – so that it applies to all abortions. If the cry is reversed.

“You really need more tools on the table to make sure it’s complied with,” Sego said.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *